لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, as being the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, somewhat he is acquitted of your criminal charges based on evidence and it can be effectively-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this extremely charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment with the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition has long been set at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.

12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to do away with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.

eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

only on the ground of miscases remanded & only around the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its authentic purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This may possibly transpire several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first from the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his progress from the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.

Using keywords effectively can be crucial. Think about using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific canadian case law database cases.

ten. Without touching the merits of the case from the issue of once-a-year increases while in the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision with the provincial government, this sort of annual increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment for being made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to some healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions while in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it can be important that the case proven the application of the precautionary principle where there can be a danger to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations of your State in protecting the right to a clean and healthy environment.

one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.